Energy Efficiency Measures
IRRIGATION
Minimize frictional losses in irrigation pipes by using large diameter
pipe on the mainline and minimizing turns. The installation of a 12-inch versus
a 10-inch mainline will save three horsepower when the flow rate is 1,200
gallons per minute. Assuming a quarter-mile mainline and a five-month irrigation
season, the extra pipe cost of about $1 per foot will be paid back in reduced
energy cost in two to three years.
Convert from high-pressure top impact sprinklers to low-pressure systems.
When using a low-pressure system, lower spray packages to match crop growth.
Low-pressure systems using drop tubes deliver about one percent more water for
every foot of drop tube used because evaporative losses are reduced. The lower
the spray package, the more efficient the system becomes.
When replacing or installing a new motor, select a high- or
premium-efficiency pump motor over a standard-efficiency model. More
efficient motors run cooler, last longer, and save 3 – 5% a month on electric
consumption. Motors that run under load at a substantial duty cycle typically
use electricity that costs 10 to 20 times their purchase price each year. So
investing in premium-efficiency motors can have a very fast payback. The
Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE) maintains model specifications and a data
base on premium-efficiency motors; see
www.cee1.org/ind/motrs/motrs-main.php3.
Match the pump and motor combination to flow and pressure requirements.
Over-sizing makes for inefficiencies that waste energy and cost money.
Installing variable speed drives (VSD) on existing motors allows for
modulating motor speed to achieve the desired flow. When irrigation requirements
change, flow can be adjusted quickly and accurately.
Replace worn nozzles and regulators. A useful rule of thumb is that
nozzle wear of 10 percent results in a 20 percent increase in flow. The average
life expectancy of a nozzle and a regulator under optimum conditions is around 8
to 10 years. However, during low-water conditions, irrigation pumps must pull
water from lower depths. This pushes more sand and silt through nozzles and
regulators, increasing wear. When such sediment is present, life expectancy
decreases to 3 to 5 years for nozzles and 5 years for regulators.
For example, if an irrigation system has a typical quarter-mile pivot, it
will have perhaps 140 nozzles and 140 regulators. If the irrigation system was
set for 1,200 gallons per minute five years ago and the nozzles are 20% worn,
the pump is now trying to push more water through the system, but it is working
overtime and providing less head. This results in too much flow at the start of
the pivot and too little at the end. As a result, the system wastes energy,
wastes water, and produces uneven crop growth. New nozzles cost around $1.50 and
regulators $6.00. For $210 in nozzles and $840 for regulators (not counting
labor) the system can be brought back to its original efficiency.
Combining efficiency measures with measuring soil moisture
Approximately 1.7 million acres of land, or about 3% of total surface area,
is used as cropland in Utah. While much of this cropland is non-irrigated,
irrigation plays an important role in Utah’s agricultural economy – and thus, so
does water conservation. In a recent demonstration1 aimed at saving
both water and energy, the Western Area Power Administration upgraded ten
irrigation systems in eastern Colorado. Measures undertaken were:
- Replacing old well pumps and motors with high-efficiency units matched to
anticipated loads (100 hp motors were installed in most cases);
- Refitting center pivot units with drop nozzles that apply water near
ground level; and
- Adopting watering schedules based on soil moisture measurements.
The measuring system plays a particularly important role. It consists of
gypsum blocks buried at regular intervals in holes 4.5 feet (for corn fields) to
5 feet (alfalfa) deep. Sampling their moisture content at regular intervals
produces data useful in adjusting watering intervals and quantities to optimize
growth while avoiding both over- and under-watering. The results of the
demonstration projects are not yet available, but the energy efficiency
improvements alone are estimated at 30%.
Resources
The U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
program provides numerous resources that will help in the design of an
energy-efficient irrigation system.
For technical advice on improving the efficiency of a pumping system, visit
www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/tip_sheets_pumps.html.
To learn how to reduce pumping costs through optimized pipe sizing, visit
www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/pdfs/motor1.pdf.
For best practices specific to motor systems, visit
www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/motors.html.
The Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE) maintains model specifications and
a data base on premium-efficiency motors; see
www.cee1.org/ind/motrs/motrs-main.php3.
Visit the Energy Efficiency Measures page of
this website to get information on ways you can improve the energy efficiency of
other components of your irrigation system.
1 Energy Services Bulletin, October 2003, Vol. 22
No. 5 available at
www.wapa.gov/es/pubs/esb/2003/03oct/esb103.htm. |